We may control the Air, but the enemy controls the airwaves (Media).
Wars are expensive, and America’s war against ISIS is no exception.
When we last looked at the cost of U.S. support for the fight against ISIS n Iraq and Syria, in early October 2014, I estimated that the U.S. had spent about $800 million, and was on track to spend billions of dollars more as the war dragged on. The latest numbers quoted by The Atlantic, relying on data reported by Reuters and estimates from the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, confirm this.
From Aug. 8 through Dec. 11, the U.S. spent $1.02 billion on combat operations against ISIS, and is spending at the rate of $8.1 million per day, according to The Atlantic. Much of that money was spent on weapons being drawn down from existing Pentagon inventory. A new report from Defense One, though, suggests the cost of the war is about to more than double.
I’ll see your $1 billion, and raise you $1.5 billion
Over the past six months, the U.S. military and its allies have struck nearly 2,700 targets in Iraq, deploying more than 3,000 bombs and missiles in the process — primarily Joint Direct Attack Munitions manufactured by Boeing (NYSE: BA ) , and Hellfire missiles built by Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT ) . Sounding the alarm that the U.S. might not have “enough bombs and missiles to continue striking Islamic State strongholds in Iraq and Syria,”Defense One reported last week that not only the “U.S. military,” but also those of our allies, are “re-evaluating the size of their bomb stockpiles.”
According to Lt. Gen. James Holmes, Air Force deputy chief of staff for strategic plans and requirements, while the U.S. isn’t yet “running out of weapons,” it is “using weapons at a pretty good rate in northern Iraq and in Syria.” Pretty soon, it will be necessary to replenish the stockpiles. In fact, Pentagon acquisitions chief Frank Kendall went so far as to say that “obviously they have to be replaced.”
At last report, the U.S. Air Force had requested $559 million in funding to purchase nearly 13,000 Joint Direct Attack Munitions, and a further $700 million to buy 5,567 Hellfire missiles — and that’s just one military branch. Last month, the U.S. Army awarded Lockheed a $144 million contract to build 2,060 Hellfiresfor U.S. allies Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, and Australia — several of which are assisting with the fight against ISIS.
The month before that, the Navy placed a $139 million order with Raytheon (NYSE: RTN ) to supply it with 100 Tomahawk cruise missiles. (Which we can use up pretty quick. On the first day of combat operations against ISIS in Syria, for example, the Navy expended 47 Tomahawks — at $1.4 million a pop).
Tally up all these costs, and the price of replacing ordnance expended already tops $1.5 billion — and this isn’t even a complete list. For example, word has it Navy fighter jets also use bombs and missiles on occasion.
What it means for investors
If this cost helps to save innocent lives in countries threatened by ISIS, to protect world cultural heritage sites from ISIS bulldozers, and to defend U.S. interests in the region, it may be worth the money.
From an investor’s perspective, though, news of the massive increase in weapons purchases needed to keep the bombs dropping on ISIS means just one thing: additional revenue streams pouring into munitions makers Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon. But how much additional revenue are we talking about here?
Well, crunching the data from S&P Capital IQ, we come up with combined annual revenue of $159.2 billion annually for Boeing, Lockheed, and Raytheon. Just the weapons purchases that we know about amount to about a 1% increase in overall revenue at these defense contractors. When you consider that analysts only project about 10%-ish annual growth from these companies going forward, a 1% increase is already enough to move the needle on these businesses.
What’s more, Pentagon acquisitions chief Kendall said, in his view at least, “We’re engaged in a conflict now that will probably go on for some time.” So $1.5 billion could be just the beginning.
For investors in these companies, it could be a very profitable beginning indeed.
On April 1, our CEO will buy one of these three stocks…
Will Thorndike’s book The Outsiders details eight CEOs whose unconventional business approach allowed their companies to outperform the S&P 500 by a staggering 20X. Mean that just $10,000 invested into each of these eight companies would have been worth more than $1.5 MILLION just 25 years later.
That’s why on April 1st, Motley Fool co-founder and CEO Tom Gardner will commit to back one of three “Outsider-esque” stocks in his personal Everlasting Portfolio (a portfolio that consists of the only public stocks he currently owns… and the only stocks he will ever own in the future) that he manages within The Motley Fool’s premier, all-access service – Motley Fool ONE.
To discover more about Fool ONE, and get the full story on each of these three elite stocks, simply click here now!
Analysis of the 30 September 2013 BBC Panorama documentary 'Saving Syria's Children' and related BBC News reports, contending that sequences filmed by BBC personnel and others at Atareb Hospital, Aleppo on 26 August 2013 purporting to show the aftermath of an incendiary bomb attack on a school in Urm Al-Kubra are largely, if not entirely, staged.
The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change
Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine
Viewing conflicts through the eye of Counterinsurgency COIN - Since 2007
We have to find a way to counter the Enemys Propaganda and Islamaphobia
Non lasciare che la scintilla venga del tutto spenta dalle legge - Paul Klee -
A beautiful magazine theme
News ~ Resources ~ Activism
A bit of Bible, A bit of Life, A bit of Politics
Conservative Views and News.
Nationally Syndicated Editorial Cartoonist
News and Opinions From Inside China
The Newspapers Today
News & Analysis from Turkey